At the end of October, a popular streamer Michael Grysik (Michael Grzesiek), or Shroud, left Twitch on Mixer because Microsoft I entered into a contract for a tidy amount with him. But from the American spectators Streimer, not all decided to leave the former site.

These data were provided by StreamMetrics for spectators from the USA:

• On Twitch before the departure of Streimer, there were about 718,000 unique spectators from the USA to a month – this is in 1.62 times more than the entire American audience Mixer.

• The American audience of Shroud on Mixer in November was 1/3 of its American audience on Twitch months earlier – 231,000 unique spectators in November against 718,000 in October.

• Only 15 % of American viewers who watched Shroud broadcasts on Twitch in October looked at Mixer in November. However, 47 % of his audience from the United States in November consisted of spectators who watched Twitch streams in October.

• More than half of Shroud American viewers in November for the first time discovered Mixer. This means that 127,000 spectators from the United States, who followed the streamer on Mixer, did not look at a single channel on this platform back in October.

Recall that the first from Twitch to Mixer moved to the notorious Ninja. He also did not manage to return his entire previous audience, but already made the site Microsoft Good advertising.

December 17, 2019 10 worst games for 2019 according to Metacritic statistics

December 17, 2019 Neksten from Microsoft will be called just Xbox

The best comments

My favorite section on Stopgaim, news about the unemployed, Why is his shape nothing cooler than my ?)

A fairly simple answer to the question -> For hours to entertain thousands of people with their voice and facial impulses, while he deftly controls his manipulators, as one thinker said “not everyone can do that. Rather, not only all can. Few who can do this ", so you can handle!, You have every chance of developing your own nothing to the same coolness, and enjoys the unemployed free, such chances as becoming actor AAAA, or cybercactlet, shorter than Izikatka.

And what is the applied benefits of singers, actors, all who entertain the audience standing on stage (what is the benefit of games developers, because they simply entertain people with their games in the dry rest)? The Letzples have long been a method of joining a game that you have no way to play, streams are just the development of this idea, but with the possibility of a direct interactive.

You answered the question, and immediately asked him. In streams, some streamers regularly receive comments with gratitude for the fact that the streams of a particular person helped the viewer go through difficult times – depression, complex family or financial situation, rehabilitation after illness, etc.D … that you do not see benefit, does not mean that it is not for anyone.

I sincerely believe that a person can cope with his problems, for this reason, I don’t understand or I do not want to understand this benefit of Stream. For me it looks more as part of our modern cultural paradigm, which causes negative emotions in me

But it seems to me that https://noidverificationcasinos.co.uk/ you have never encountered psychological disorders. Depression is not to be sad on the window with coffee in your hands and thoughts about it. This is a rather terrible thing, which a person can not always cope himself.

Of course, if we are talking about people to whom the specialist has diagnosed.

There is no importance in entertainment either. With the same success you can sit with a good person and have a pleasant conversation, face to face

"There is no importance in entertainment, with the same success you can find entertainment with another person".
Facepalm

Exactly, it is for this that they were created, certainly. People who have an audience of a 20-30 person, with whom they come to chat and play and play, will be very surprised by such news.

In general, your question is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the importance of entertainment for a person as a representative of modern civilization. This is one of the main needs of each of us. Streamers with their activities are just one of the methods that allow this need to implement, and many begin to do this precisely because it was boring to play alone, I decided to play with an online audience to make it more fun, ”that is, not money for the sake of pleasure for the pleasure for. Well, you can conduct interesting dialogs and exchange information with new people. This is the benefit. It’s so simple that I doubt it at all that you are a person. You will leave the planet, do not forget to leave the registration mark.

You yourself do not understand what you are talking about.
Well, this impression is formed after reading your posts.

Some activities are entertaining in nature, do not bring any benefit, and you recognize them. Films, art, theaters, circuses, television, all kinds of artists, games.
But you have an initially biased negative attitude to the streams, and you do not recognize their entertaining role (benefit).

Although there is no difference between them.

Especially funny about making money. as if exclusively beggars altruists go to artists and singers.

If you are talking about relaxation, then everything has long been invented, there was no high technology for this

Charles Dewell, director of the US Patent Bureau, said in 1899: "Everything that could be invented has already been invented". It seems that you or his relative, or from those people who are not capable or do not want to see all the complexity and endless potential of the development of reality surrounding us. This dialogue is over.

Everything is quite simple:

Firstly, the importance of entertainment-it is, there is, without a modern culture, standard of living, the presence of the Internet, and so on. Read, I don’t know, the “future of mankind” at least, there are a very simple language of this several chapters, where a smart person, with the support of other smart people, clearly shows that it was since the times when we sat in the caves, and this did not go away, the methods that became more, which became more. Streams are just one of the methods, part of the modernity, but nothing important.

Secondly, this position is very unsuccessful and does not lead anywhere. That is, "I do not understand anything and do not want to understand, but I have all my opinion". Understand the question, this is not some kind of “parallel reality”, this is the world in which you live. If millions of people are passionate about something, then the reasons. And no, this does not mean that you also need to get involved in this and delve into all this, but it is usually useful to understand how everything is around, at least not to look stupid in conversations, at a maximum to understand what potential opportunities for personal development.

Films carry no more educational idea, but moral if we are talking about a good movie. Singers, as a result, the songs themselves are also. All this can be characterized by a general word

There is nothing more there.
And yes, this is not a "specific description of the benefit".
there is no, in fact, the very benefit, nor its description.

I really did not develop the idea that even the factual Osvoa of this statement is false.

Only in the case of the theater, the artist scratches the ego, perhaps someone else from the crowd, feeling like a "superman". With streams, everything is much worse.

What? You seem to really not understand what you write.
What is terrible in streams? That’s what?

It seems to me that you think through the word.
And I read everything. Here I answer – yes, selectively, to separate important parts … for responding to each word is pointless.

Sounds like "how to get wet from the soft".
Quick Math. On Twitch (in October) he was watched by 718000 people. On a mixer (in November), three times less people are looking at him – 231000. Of these 231000 (and not out of 718000), 47% are people who watched him on Twitch. That is, from 718,000 people, about 100k people passed to the mixer, less than one sixth of its original audience on Twitch.

Ok, let’s again, on the fingers. Shraud left Twitch to a mixer at the end of October. Let’s take a look at the quote from at the top once again, but we will highlight a little different.

However, 47 % of his audience from the USA In November consisted of spectators who watched Twitch streams in October.

Again, his entire audience from the USA (and indeed) In November I was on a mixer. And 47% of the percent we consider from this audience, not from the audience of Twitch. This has nothing to do with 1/3 (47% is just calculated from this 1/3).
I still don’t see what is diverging here.

Unlike a funny quote

Only 15 % of American viewers who watched Shroud’s broadcasts on Twitch in October looked at Mixer in November. However, 47 % of his audience from the United States in November consisted of spectators who watched Twitch streams in October.

Because 15% of the US audience, which watched Shreud on Twitch, is 47% of his audience from the USA on a mixer.

This is of course all good, but why Microsoft cannot attract spectators from other countries to the platform (for example, give money to Russian or Asian streamers)? If they call only Americans there, then in the end the site itself will simply bend, because the same Ninja did not give up to everyone except the Americans at all, and I personally, but what is there, everyone who prefers the suitable content from the mixer from Twich, this would obviously would not like to.