"Army of Frankenstein" – European horror movie 2013 about an alternative second world. Soviet soldiers find a secret Nazi laboratory, where people are conducting experiments in Dr. Frankenstein’s style. The film received mediocre grades in the region of 5 out of 10, but stood out with grotesque images of people with all kinds of iron extensions.

IN Resident Evil Village There are also people with iron buildings too. Director "Army of Frankenstein" Richard Raphorst (Richard Raaphorst) considered that the team Capcom stole one image from his film to create a boss for Village:

In 2013, I was the director of my film "Army of Frankenstein". This is a crazy film about monsters filled with creatures with my design, one of which was used in the last game Resident Evil – without my permission or indication of authorship.

Raphorst talks about the boss at the Heisenberg factory – instead of the head, the creature has an airplane engine. The same is in "Army of Frankenstein". In the course of the battle in Village The head of the engine covers the flame-there is a similar episode in the film.

Someone on Twitter started a thread where he continues analogies "Army of Frankenstein" with opponents in a factory from Village. There the similarity is no longer so strong, but Raphorst I still reacted with pain:

“Damn, everything is even worse than I thought. At first I felt anger, then pride, but now I saw it and feel sad ”.

Raphorst I hatched the idea of ​​my film for a very long time. The first ideas about the whole army of the monsters of Frankenstein visited it as a child, and the first sketches with the design of monsters in the interior of World War II, he drew in the early 2000s.

IN Village You can look through the working illustrations with comments by the artistic director. They say that Capcom created Heisenberg in the image of Dr. Frankenstein. But in the picture with propeller -headed sources of inspiration are not mentioned: maybe artists Capcom Really looked "Army of Frankenstein", Or maybe this is a banal coincidence.

However, the network is already joking that Capcom I came up with a-engine engine long before the film Raphorst!

May 10, 2021 It seems that the debut of the new Battlefield will take place this week

May 10, 2021 “Long live chaos!" – Trailer" Venoma 2 "

The best comments

Well, a monster with a screw engine is really one in one. The best that the developer can do now is to spread the curtsy towards the film and admit that yes, they were inspired.

Rapkhorst talks about the boss at the Heisenberg factory – instead of the head, the creature stands [b] a screw [/b] engine from an airplane.

This [b] piston [/b] engine.

What do you have to have problems with memory. This phenomenon really exists. When you see some kind of alien idea or image, it is deposited in memory without marking for a source, and then, after a long time, the brain recalls it and gives it off as your original.

It is stupid to call plagiarism when it is a feature of the brain. Moreover, cases of the invention of the same different people in different parts of the world who do not even know about each other work similarly, but they come up with the same thing at about the same time.

On the Utopia Show channel, this was understood in detail and was explained in the video called “Your ideas in my hands” if anyone is interested.

The similarity of the monsters https://nokyccasinos.org.uk/review/lucki-casino/ is too obvious, then it would be to deny it. It is better to make it a capsu is now to say that a new series of re in the same universe with AF))

In the course of the battle in Village, the head of the engine covers the flame-there is a similar episode in the film.

For this occasion, I have a phrase that is not trying to offend, but still

And the engine should dousise with water?

Hidden technical illiteracy, Pasib with:

– We steal the design of the boss?

– We requisition. We requisition the design of the boss. Sea term.

I agree with the artist’s comments in the direction of this screw -headed one, but the rest of the examples can hardly be called plagiarism. Rather, there was one source of inspiration, quite natural, moreover. Images have more in common with residents of delight from Bioshok. And movie even more.

Each time, such “disputes and resentment” remind me of these lines:

Two poets appeared in the People’s Court.
“What are you arguing about?"The judge asked them.
“We argue about the rights to authorship of the plot! –
One poet said. – And this means,
That rhymes are here, and in rhymes thought is my!"
"Yes! – said another. – He told me the topic.
But let the People’s Court now tell us,
How to glory to us to share and money for the poem?
I offer a third. He wants – in half!"

Gave Pushkin Gogol the plot
Immortal production,
But he did not expect reward,
I did not hint at my budget ..
How widely generous talents
And how insignificant merchants are!

It was written about a free PR, I portrayed what was wrong?

"The events of Dereretzika take place in the setting of my film, hear the passaters"

Thanks for support. I did not know about such a video. Well, you won’t be ahead of such an argument, since it is on the Internet and, moreover, a video has been shot about it, then this is exactly true!) Shah and mat, guys with a mosaic consciousness)).

But you can separately those very arguments? Otherwise "I am inadvertently" – such an argument.
For companies, Wika says, who shot the army of Frankenstein: Dark Sky Films, Pellicola, Xyz Films, MPI Media Group. This is not enough for me, but I’m not a specialist. I understand the film industry badly. Nevertheless, I can assume (by the way, (!) assume) that really not very large. Therefore, the assumption expressed above is still seen quite probable.
Well, as for

It is deposited in memory without marking for a source,

– This will definitely be a sign of unprofessionalism. Or redness, such a phenomenon is also represented in the creative environment. Those who collect the best without a twinge and give out for their own do not like art/musical cuisine (I believe that also in film and even research and other similar ones). But outside they often get honor and honor (and kilograms of money of course). This is life. Even here they justify a very clear plagiarism with a strange thesis "He is accidental". Despite the fact that it is assumed that there was a serious professional (very justified assumption).

By the way, one more point. Remember the source and return to it if you started working with its elements are not just useful. This is extremely necessary. Contrary to widespread opinion, the artist rarely works directly “from the head” (most often do lovers do this). Usually material is taken (nature, sketch/sketch, someone else’s work) and drawn "according to it". Of course, if we are not talking about reproduction, the artist changes many elements. Or collects elements of many in one job. But having an object is very important before your eyes. Especially if the work is not one day. Because the next day it is difficult to even remember what you saw there yesterday, what can’t be seen today.

Hmm, it became interesting, and the film itself is generally standing?

I will continue the thought to make it more clear:

I have already described above that it doesn’t work like that

Just the opposite. Does not work as you described. An extremely rare case. In addition, amateur approach. Always, in any artist, you will be taught to keep the material before your eyes all the time. Make a sketch that you can then lean on (a sketch is as a work plan as a whole). And even with a detailed sketch, still more often look at the material.

Ok, I will quote myself

What do you have to have problems with memory. This phenomenon really exists. When you see some kind of alien idea or image, it is deposited in memory without marking for a source, and then, after a long time, the brain recalls it and gives it off as your original.

It is stupid to call plagiarism when it is a feature of the brain. Moreover, cases of the invention of the same different people in different parts of the world who do not even know about each other work similarly, but they come up with the same thing at about the same time.

On the Utopia Show channel, this was understood in detail and was explained in the video called “Your ideas in my hands” if anyone is interested.

T.e. There is such a scientific phenomenon in our brain. And it is not necessarily plagiarism, all the more conscious. (at the same time, the case of conscious plagiarism is not excluded). You can study in detail the video on the topic of this phenomenon. It has links to all scientific literature on this issue.

Remember the source and return to it if you started working with its elements are not just useful

Provided that you really worked with some source, and did not take the idea out of your head.

Dark Sky Films, Pellicola, Xyz Films, Mpi Media Group.

I watched the filmography of the companies. Everything except XYZ is really small and trash studios. XYZ is a very large company that produced and shot raid 1 and 2, Vivarium and many other medium and small films. Here they are definitely not from the bastard bay.

Well, at least it became interesting for me to watch this movie)

The difference between conscious and unconscious, you apparently deliberately ignore. Well, good luck as an artist to remember all the smallest details of thousands of watches, books, etc.D.

In general, middle -level trades. I watched it in a view of the terlcam, the film itself would probably not have mastered